<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Columbia miners earn &gt;$100K compared to the average of $42K</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ithinkmining.com/2008/07/13/british-columbia-miners-earn-100k-compared-to-the-average-of-42k/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ithinkmining.com/2008/07/13/british-columbia-miners-earn-100k-compared-to-the-average-of-42k/</link>
	<description>Sharp opinions about mines and mining from Jack Caldwell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:55:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan</title>
		<link>http://ithinkmining.com/2008/07/13/british-columbia-miners-earn-100k-compared-to-the-average-of-42k/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ithink.mining.com/?p=660#comment-771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s good to be back again, reading Jack Caldwell.  After a couple of weeks away on vacation, I couldn&#039;t resist reading what I&#039;d been missing on I Think Mining.  So, ever so slightly delayed, here are my comments to this posting:

First of all, it&#039;s good to think that mining skills are well regarded, thus well paid, and that those people who choose  to make a living in the mining industry are making an average $100K  a year vs. the much lower $42K that their counterparts in other industries make.  This begs for a comment about the benefits of being part of a productive and, yes, lucrative sector of the economy.  If you could get paid more than twice than what you currently make  for what you do, wouldn&#039;t you like it better?

It seems obvious to me that mining, as an industry, not only creates jobs, but well-paid ones at that!  I only wish there were more articles like this in the mass media.  For that reason, I&#039;m going to post this piece in my own blogspot.  Cheers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to be back again, reading Jack Caldwell.  After a couple of weeks away on vacation, I couldn&#8217;t resist reading what I&#8217;d been missing on I Think Mining.  So, ever so slightly delayed, here are my comments to this posting:</p>
<p>First of all, it&#8217;s good to think that mining skills are well regarded, thus well paid, and that those people who choose  to make a living in the mining industry are making an average $100K  a year vs. the much lower $42K that their counterparts in other industries make.  This begs for a comment about the benefits of being part of a productive and, yes, lucrative sector of the economy.  If you could get paid more than twice than what you currently make  for what you do, wouldn&#8217;t you like it better?</p>
<p>It seems obvious to me that mining, as an industry, not only creates jobs, but well-paid ones at that!  I only wish there were more articles like this in the mass media.  For that reason, I&#8217;m going to post this piece in my own blogspot.  Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

